In the modern world, science and technology have taken full effect of events bringing a recognizable gap between scholar and theologians in matters concerning the faith. There have been attempts to harmonize the differences, but eventually, conservatives remain adamant to compromise on certain issue thereby widening the rift. Below are some valuable perspectives of Tempe liberal church.
The first to discuss is the authority of the religion as a true belief. Their perspective is that there is no sole authority powerhouse, but they acknowledge the contribution of modern knowledge and experience in interpretation of Holy Scriptures. They believe that Christianity should be modern and progressive thereby undergoing a sense of revolution in its way of interpretation thus relevant without being based on external authority.
The next thing is about the New Jerusalem or the world to come. They discourage laxity in Christians to keep waiting for that new world without being responsible for improving their own lives. They encourage members to participate in various categories of human life and contribute accordingly to elect new leadership and other factors affecting their life rather than neglecting the current affairs.
It is also their pillar that the religion should be credible and relevant to the modern social setup. It is open to modern judgments based on intellectual in connection with inquiries about nature and even on perspectives given by modern social science. It promotes the need for an ethical way of life and supports the moral concept of atonement. It is to make the gospel relevant to modern society.
They also divert the thought that only particular ways of truths are the sole truth, especially where presented in certain forms and symbols. They advocate for changes that will lead to more reasonable interpretation rather than symbolic or analogy that was presented by predecessors and made like the truth itself. They discourage adoration of symbols and forms as the real truths.
It is also their explanation that the current differences on various issues on fundamental faith beliefs could be a product of interpretation and language barriers. They believe there is one fundamental thing that is faith or belief, but the presentation is marred with ambiguities that yield grounds for disagreements. The main concern is the central belief but also believe that language is the main course of disagreements.
It is also important to understand that historical accuracies of biblical facts and flow of events as presented in the bible are not the basis of faith. Their main concern is the general teaching of Christ in all those passages in the gospels. It is not about the accuracy of flow of events but the truths presented by each storyline or narration rather than its chronological order in various books.
According to them, true religion is based on the way of Christ not all existing doctrine about the Messiah. They argue that this religion is a faith, not a doctrine of Christ where its main focus is learning about Christ. Their belief is the Christ himself and his main goal of saving mankind.
The first to discuss is the authority of the religion as a true belief. Their perspective is that there is no sole authority powerhouse, but they acknowledge the contribution of modern knowledge and experience in interpretation of Holy Scriptures. They believe that Christianity should be modern and progressive thereby undergoing a sense of revolution in its way of interpretation thus relevant without being based on external authority.
The next thing is about the New Jerusalem or the world to come. They discourage laxity in Christians to keep waiting for that new world without being responsible for improving their own lives. They encourage members to participate in various categories of human life and contribute accordingly to elect new leadership and other factors affecting their life rather than neglecting the current affairs.
It is also their pillar that the religion should be credible and relevant to the modern social setup. It is open to modern judgments based on intellectual in connection with inquiries about nature and even on perspectives given by modern social science. It promotes the need for an ethical way of life and supports the moral concept of atonement. It is to make the gospel relevant to modern society.
They also divert the thought that only particular ways of truths are the sole truth, especially where presented in certain forms and symbols. They advocate for changes that will lead to more reasonable interpretation rather than symbolic or analogy that was presented by predecessors and made like the truth itself. They discourage adoration of symbols and forms as the real truths.
It is also their explanation that the current differences on various issues on fundamental faith beliefs could be a product of interpretation and language barriers. They believe there is one fundamental thing that is faith or belief, but the presentation is marred with ambiguities that yield grounds for disagreements. The main concern is the central belief but also believe that language is the main course of disagreements.
It is also important to understand that historical accuracies of biblical facts and flow of events as presented in the bible are not the basis of faith. Their main concern is the general teaching of Christ in all those passages in the gospels. It is not about the accuracy of flow of events but the truths presented by each storyline or narration rather than its chronological order in various books.
According to them, true religion is based on the way of Christ not all existing doctrine about the Messiah. They argue that this religion is a faith, not a doctrine of Christ where its main focus is learning about Christ. Their belief is the Christ himself and his main goal of saving mankind.
About the Author:
Tempe liberal church invites you to pay a quick visit to its official website. Here is the web page you need at http://www.desertpalmucc.org.